The Educational Approach of The Community Health Worker
Certificate Program vs. Traditional Approach
|
|
Traditional Approach |
CHW Approach |
|
Learning all aspects of the health system |
Training for ?lever-pullers" |
Education for community health leadership: Learners get overview of health system and current debates. |
|
Role of class members |
Passive recipient of information from instructor |
Class members? experience valued and integrated (for example: experienced CHWs do presentations for class). |
|
Relationship between practice setting (employers/workers/ community) and college/university |
Minimal. Assumption that college/university ?knows all" and practice setting/ employer is the learner. |
Dynamic interchange. ?Many classes taught by practitioners; ?Internship integral to educational program; ?Job task analysis defined by high-performing workers; ?Performance standards set by employers and veteran workers; ?Educational institution contributes to and disseminates "best practices" tested at the workplace. |
|
Place of interpersonal and process competencies (teamwork skills, conflict resolution skills, etc.) |
Marginal to curriculum and grading; program focuses on content and individual technical knowledge. |
Integral to curriculum and evaluation/grading procedures, in accordance with SCANS* findings on what employers value. |
*SCANS: Secretary?s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills
|
Educational methods used for first-level health professionals |
Rows and columns of students engaged in memorizing protocols and procedures via lecture/text/exam. |
Use same methods for teaching complex problem solving and critical thinking as used in top universities: ?Role plays with "standardized clients;" ?Problem Based Learning; ?Authentic Learning (Example: Learners develop and implement a health education display for a clinic waiting room, complete with a budget, project timeline, etc.); ?Dialog with veteran practitioners and leaders in the field. |
|
Classroom atmosphere |
Formal and distant |
Rigorous and also warm classroom atmosphere (for example, class members prepare potluck dinners, learning teams support students to overcome personal difficulties). |
|
Relationships among segments of higher education system |
Separate. No educational ladders; courses taken at community college not transferable, so vocational training is dead end. |
Interwoven. ?Courses articulation and enhanced counseling. ?Cross-enrollment (example: CHW students studying at SFSU) ?Planning and coordination across institutions and degree programs (AS/BS/MPH). |
|
Attitude about socio-economic class |
Assumption made that all patients are middle class. (For the best nutrients: "Prepare a medley of fresh vegetables and stir-fry briefly.") |
Focus on the special challenges of the urban and working poor. ("How to eat your best while cooking on a hot plate in your single room occupancy hotel room.") |
|
Attitude about ethnicity |
Assumption that patients are white and English-speaking.
Assumption that cultural beliefs will be old-fashioned, exotic and deficient. |
Recognition of new majority in California and urban areas: emphasis on cultural competency and ability to work with linguistic diversity (For example, there are 120 languages in Los Angeles).
Strength-based approach. ("Cut back the junk food and cook like your grandmother did.") |
|
Approach to gender |
Gender a marginal concern. |
Gender-appropriate services taught. (Example: Awareness that domestic violence is a major public health issue.) |
|
Approach to sexuality |
Assumption that all students, clients and providers are heterosexual. |
Curriculum prepares learners to work respectfully with gay/lesbian/bisexual clients and co-workers; challenges homophobic myths. |
|
Setting for field experience |
Hospitals |
Clinics and community based organizations |