The Educational Approach of The Community Health Worker
Certificate Program vs. Traditional Approach
|
|
Traditional Approach
|
CHW Approach
|
|
Learning all aspects of the health system
|
Training for ?lever-pullers"
|
Education for community health leadership: Learners get
overview of health system and current debates.
|
|
Role of class members
|
Passive recipient of information from instructor
|
Class members? experience valued and integrated (for
example: experienced CHWs do presentations for class).
|
|
Relationship between practice setting (employers/workers/
community) and college/university
|
Minimal.
Assumption that college/university ?knows all" and
practice setting/
employer is the learner.
|
Dynamic interchange.
?Many classes taught by practitioners;
?Internship integral to educational program;
?Job task analysis defined by high-performing workers;
?Performance standards set by employers and veteran
workers;
?Educational institution contributes to and disseminates
"best practices" tested at the workplace.
|
|
Place of interpersonal and process competencies
(teamwork skills, conflict resolution skills, etc.)
|
Marginal to curriculum and grading; program focuses on
content and individual technical knowledge.
|
Integral to curriculum and evaluation/grading procedures,
in accordance with SCANS* findings on what employers value.
|
*SCANS: Secretary?s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills
|
Educational methods used for first-level health
professionals
|
Rows and columns of students engaged in memorizing
protocols and procedures via lecture/text/exam.
|
Use same methods for teaching complex problem solving and
critical thinking as used in top universities:
?Role plays with "standardized clients;"
?Problem Based Learning;
?Authentic Learning
(Example: Learners develop and implement a health
education display for a clinic waiting room, complete with a budget, project
timeline, etc.);
?Dialog with veteran practitioners and leaders in the
field.
|
|
Classroom atmosphere
|
Formal and distant
|
Rigorous and also warm classroom atmosphere (for example,
class members prepare potluck dinners, learning teams support students to
overcome personal difficulties).
|
|
Relationships among segments of higher education system
|
Separate.
No educational ladders; courses taken at community college
not transferable, so vocational training is dead end.
|
Interwoven.
?Courses articulation and enhanced counseling.
?Cross-enrollment (example: CHW students studying at SFSU)
?Planning and coordination across institutions and degree
programs (AS/BS/MPH).
|
|
Attitude about socio-economic class
|
Assumption made that all patients are middle class.
(For the best nutrients: "Prepare a medley of fresh
vegetables and stir-fry briefly.")
|
Focus on the special challenges of the urban and working
poor.
("How to eat your best while cooking on a hot plate
in your single room occupancy hotel room.")
|
|
Attitude about ethnicity
|
Assumption that patients are white and English-speaking.
Assumption that cultural beliefs will be old-fashioned,
exotic and deficient.
|
Recognition of new majority in California and urban areas:
emphasis on cultural competency and ability to work with linguistic diversity
(For example, there are 120 languages in Los Angeles).
Strength-based approach.
("Cut back the junk food and cook like your grandmother
did.")
|
|
Approach to gender
|
Gender a marginal concern.
|
Gender-appropriate services taught. (Example: Awareness
that domestic violence is a major public health issue.)
|
|
Approach to sexuality
|
Assumption that all students, clients and providers are
heterosexual.
|
Curriculum prepares learners to work respectfully with
gay/lesbian/bisexual clients and co-workers; challenges homophobic myths.
|
|
Setting for field experience
|
Hospitals
|
Clinics and community based organizations
|